Testimony to Texas Senate Committee on Health and Human Services
Hearing on Delivery of Texas Mental Health Services
August 23, 2006
My name is John Breeding. Some of you know me from past opportunities I have had to testify to your committee on issues related to specific mental health legislation. I appreciate the opportunity to say a few more general words about the state mental health system.
Whereas I have most often testified on behalf of a group of which I was a part, I represent only myself just now, and my testimony comes from experience. My main work is that I am a mental health professional, going on 25 years as a practicing psychologist here in Austin. I have worked as a counselor with people at every level of care from acute to moderate to severe levels of psychological distress. I counsel people in my office. Last week, I counseled a group of young people and parents in a West Austin home after a 20-year-old college student shot himself in Bentwood Park. The next day, I met with someone at the Austin State Hospital. I have testified on occasion at hearings on involuntary incarceration and forced drugging at the local psychiatric hospitals. I have written a few books and articles on psychology and psychiatry and the delivery of mental health care in our society.
In order to rationally address the subject of this committee hearing on how to fix or improve our mental health system here in Texas, I am bound first to declare my view that we really don't have anything close to what I would call an authentic way of responding to people in distress and promoting psychological well-being. Not unlike the rest of the nation, Texas treatment of the "mentally ill" is mostly determined by corporate special interests, and notorious for its history and current reality of fraud and corruption. Here are just three examples that have involved the legislature.
Three Examples of Texas Mental Health System Fraud and Corruption
1.. In 1991, then Senator Mike Moncrief opened an investigation into allegations that the huge profits of the psychiatric hospitals of National Medical Enterprises (now Tenet) were a result of criminal and unethical exploitation of the people who had come for help. Senator Zaffirini was very involved. The Texas attorney general obtained a settlement for the maximum allowable amount of $10 million. NME eventually settled with insurance companies for over $200 million more.
b.. The last two Texas legislative sessions involved intense work, led by Representative Hupp, in response to CPS and foster care scandals. One aspect of this was (and is) the massive use of psychotropic drugs, and so-called polypharmacy, with our state's foster children. Comptroller Strayhorn's investigations have played a key role, as has the governor appointed inspector general for Department of Health and Human services, Brian Flood. In fact, the Houston Chronicle reported that just last week Inspector General Flood sent out letters ordering five doctors to return Medicaid money for overprescribing psychotropic drugs to foster children. A bit of good news is that the paper also reported a 31% decrease in the number of foster kids prescribed 5 or more psychotropic drugs in the last five months since the state implemented new regulations stemming form the last legislative session. I see this as a tiny bit of progress in the face of the shameful and tragic practice of mas! sively drugging these precious children in the care of our state.
c.. An emerging scandal involves the development and implementation of the Texas Medication Algorithm Project (TMAP) and its attendant children's version of CMAP. As local TV news investigator Nanci Wilson has revealed in a series of powerful exposes, the direct influence peddling of corporate pharmaceutical companies on the development of these algorithms is an egregious example of the determination of state mental health policy and practice by corporate pharmaceutical interests. In the last legislative session, an amendment to SB 6, sponsored by Representative Lois Kolkhorst barred people with vested interests from participating on groups developing drug and treatment guidelines. The amendment was stripped out of the conference committee compromise on that legislation.
We do not have an authentic mental health care system. What we have is an unholy alliance of the corporate pharmaceutical industry, institutional psychiatry and the state. What we have is a psychiatric labeling system and an attendant psychotropic drugging system, backed up by the full force of the state.
I have no expectation that this subject of force is a significant part of your considerations. Nevertheless, any truly meaningful discussion of mental health care reform must not exclude confrontation of the proverbial 800-pound gorilla in the room. Institutional psychiatry is rooted in coercion; every year, thousands upon thousands of Texas citizens are incarcerated in psychiatric hospitals against their will, where they are forcibly drugged. Whatever the justification, that is a fact, and I am here to say that one who locks people up against their will, and holds the key, no matter how they may refer to themselves, is a jailer. And jailers are severely limited in therapeutic influence.
It is my view that the legislature cannot do anything really significant to fix or improve our mental health system without first facing the fact that being a part of our mental health system today means accepting and enforcing the beliefs and practices of biological psychiatry, or bio-psychiatry for short. This system believes that human troubles, failures and distresses are due to incurable biologically or genetically based defects, called mental illnesses, and assumes that psychotropic drugs are absolutely necessary to "treat" these illnesses. Hence, roughly 1 of 7 of our state's school-age children are on psychotropic drugs; millions of our adults are on these drugs; thousands upon thousands are forcibly incarcerated and put on these drugs; thousands are brain-damaged further by electroshock. It is the tragic truth that this is basically what our mental health system offers-labels and drugs. And a truth I have told again and again in the halls of this Capitol i! s that all of this is done without scientific evidence or validation of a physical or chemical abnormality denoting even one of these so-called illnesses.
We cannot really fix or improve a system that is fundamentally flawed and based in unreality.
We also cannot move forward in a positive way without making conscious at least two functions that, however hard it tries, the state mental health system simply cannot and will never be able to accomplish. One is to make our legal system better or more humane. Forensic psychiatry has been and is a disaster, interfering with justice and moral responsibility.
The other is that psychiatry deflects attention from issues of social and economic justice by explaining the suffering and distress that comes to individuals who are unable to find work that is purposeful and sufficient to meet their own and their family's needs as "mental illness." The simple truth is that legislative actions related to such things as education and work opportunities, living wages, and housing will always have a much more significant effect on the mental health of our citizens than any psychological or psychiatric program.
That said, there is still a need to respond to the troubled or troubling behavior of our fellow citizens. Fortunately, the how-to's of authentic care and support of psychological health or well-being are not all that complicated. We have abundant examples of how to do it. I will share just four thoughts on this subject.
1.. Physical health affects psychological well-being. Sleep, nutrition and exercise are key components of psychological well-being; disruptions, deficits, or imbalances in any of these can result in "symptoms" that get labeled as, for example, attention deficit disorder or depression.
b.. Social, interpersonal connection is fundamental to psychological well-being. Meaningful mental health care must be rooted here.
c.. Mental and emotional distress often results from having been hurt. Emotional discharge, such as crying, expressing anger, or shaking with fear, is not a psychiatric symptom, but a necessary part of the recovery of psychological well-being.
d.. It is very sad that the overwhelming takeover of our mental health care by the proponents of biopsychiatry has all but eliminated hope for people in extreme states of mind. Nevertheless, it remains true that even people in extreme states of mind, often diagnosed as severe mental illness such as bipolar or schizophrenia, can and do recover without drugs or electroshock. The Soteria Houses, sponsored by the National Institute of Mental Health over four decades ago, showed this. So have others, such as the Windhorse Institute, and the folks at the National Empowerment Center.
The information and resources are available. Please do not hesitate to contact me if I can be of assistance.
John Breeding, PhD
5306 Fort Clark Dr.
Austin, Texas 78745
Friday, August 25, 2006
Testimony to Texas Senate Committee on Health and Human Services